Stealing a horse is a serious offense, punishable by law in many countries. But despite this, people are still tempted to steal horses, either out of necessity or for the thrill of it. The story of Aaron is an example of someone who stole a horse and had to justify his actions. This article will explore how Aaron justified his act of stealing the horse and whether his justification was valid or not.
Aaron’s Story
Aaron was a young man who had a passion for horses. He loved to ride them, care for them and take them out for a run in the countryside. He dreamed of owning his own horse one day but it seemed like an impossible dream as he didn’t have the money to buy one.
One day, he came across a horse that was being sold at a low price. It was in poor condition and the owner was desperate to get rid of it. Aaron saw an opportunity and decided to take it. He stole the horse and took it home.
Aaron’s Justification
Now that he had the horse, Aaron had to justify his actions to himself. He believed that he had done the right thing and that the horse would be better off with him. He argued that the horse had been mistreated by its previous owner and that he was rescuing it from a life of misery.
Moreover, he argued that the horse was now his property and that he had the right to do with it as he pleased. He argued that he was not a thief, but a savior. He argued that the horse was better off with him than it would have been with its previous owner.
The Law’s Perspective
However, the law does not see things the same way. The law views stealing as a crime, no matter what the purpose is. Even if Aaron had the best intentions in mind, his actions were still against the law and punishable by law.
In addition, the law argues that Aaron had no right to take the horse without the owner’s permission. The owner had a right to the horse and Aaron had no right to take it away from him.
The Moral Perspective
On the other hand, some people may argue that Aaron’s actions were morally justified. They may argue that the horse was being mistreated and that Aaron was doing the right thing by rescuing it. They may also argue that the horse was better off with Aaron than it would have been with its previous owner.
The Practical Perspective
From a practical perspective, Aaron’s decision to steal the horse may have been the right one. The horse may have been in much better condition with Aaron than it would have been with its previous owner. Moreover, Aaron may have been able to find a better home for the horse, where the horse would have been treated with the love and care it deserved.
The Legal Perspective
However, from a legal perspective, Aaron’s actions were still wrong. No matter how noble his intentions were, he still committed a crime and he should be held accountable for it. Stealing is not only illegal, but it is also immoral and it should not be encouraged.
The Social Perspective
From a social perspective, Aaron’s decision to steal the horse may have been seen as an act of rebellion against society. In a society where people are struggling to make ends meet, stealing may seem like the only option. This may be why Aaron chose to steal the horse, in order to show society that it is possible to challenge the status quo.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Aaron’s justification for stealing the horse was not valid. He may have had the best intentions in mind, but his actions were still illegal and punishable by law. Moreover, his actions were immoral and should not be encouraged. However, from a practical and social perspective, Aaron’s decision to steal the horse may have been the right one.